10 Indian GEO, AEO and AI-search agencies compared on 8 public capability checks, published pricing, how they measure AI visibility and which business each suits best.
Public information reviewed October 2026. Pricing changes often; "custom" means no dedicated recurring GEO price was published on the pages reviewed.
✓ = 1 point, ◐ = 0.5 across the 8 capability rows in the table. Measures breadth of the public offer, not client results.
Different businesses need different partners. ITARV is listed first as the publisher; the rest are ordered by their public capability score.
Full-stack SEO + AEO + GEO with prompt-space monitoring, entity/schema work, citation operations and conversion-path review.
The same team runs Google Ads, Meta Ads, CRO and web development, so paid-search query and conversion data directly prioritise GEO work.
Strong search foundation with GEO, multi-engine tracking, entity authority, original research and schema depth.
GEO, AEO, SEO and performance marketing with AI citation audits, content architecture, entity work and authority seeding.
AI-first growth partner offering GEO/AEO, a 40-prompt multi-engine visibility panel, entity optimization and automation.
AEO/GEO for B2B SaaS with scalable content, entity modeling, citation monitoring and reporting.
Long-established SEO agency with dedicated AI SEO and GEO services covering structured data, topical authority and AI visibility.
Enterprise-focused AI SEO, GEO and AEO backed by a large traditional search operation and AI visibility reporting.
Specialist GEO studio centred on buyer-question testing, entity trust, citable content and off-site authority.
B2B SaaS and tech content programs that integrate SEO with AEO/GEO and ongoing publishing.
B2B SEO, AEO and GEO delivered as a connected organic-growth program with retainer-based pricing.
A GEO retainer should be more than "AI-friendly blogs." The useful test: can the agency set a baseline, fix technical and entity gaps, improve citable content, strengthen third-party authority and re-measure the same buyer questions?
Swipe sideways to compare all agencies →
| Capability | ITARV | Nico Digital | PROHED | Reckona AI | RevvGrowth | PageTraffic | Techmagnate | GEO Close | growth.cx | Qoulomb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEO foundation | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | GEO-first | Yes | Yes |
| AEO / direct-answer optimization | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Within GEO | Yes | Yes |
| Dedicated GEO / AI-search program | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-engine prompt monitoring | 5 major engines; fixed prompt set | 5+ engines referenced | ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude audits | 40 prompts × 4 engines | Continuous AI citation monitoring | AI visibility tracking | Major engines | Fixed battery across 4 engines | AI SEO / LLM focus | AI-driven traffic / GEO |
| Entity / knowledge-graph work | Entity consolidation + structured data | Entity authority | Entity building + knowledge graph | Entity & knowledge graph service | Entity modeling | Knowledge graphs + entities | AI-search optimization | Entity Trust Score + schema | AI SEO | Integrated GEO |
| Schema / structured data | Yes | Yes | FAQ / Article / entity markup | Schema / entity markup | FAQ / HowTo / Service / Product | Schema + JSON-LD | Part of AI SEO stack | Organization / Product / FAQ | On-page / AI SEO | Within program |
| Off-site authority / citations | Digital PR, reviews, communities, citation signals | Original research + authority work | PR / authority content seeding | AI citation strategy + digital PR | Off-page SEO | Brand mentions / EEAT signals | Enterprise authority stack | Directories, listings, mentions | Not core on pricing page | Multi-channel scope |
| Business-outcome measurement | Traffic + AI referrals + enquiry path + outcomes | Revenue / pipeline reporting referenced | Performance-marketing integration | Growth + AI visibility | GA4 + Looker AI referrals | Conversion metrics referenced | AI visibility + enterprise reporting | Share-of-voice focus | Growth / content outcomes | B2B growth program |
| Capability score | 8 / 8 | 8 / 8 | 8 / 8 | 8 / 8 | 7.5 / 8 | 7.5 / 8 | 6.5 / 8 | 6.5 / 8 | 6 / 8 | 5.5 / 8 |
| Published recurring price | Custom after audit | ₹90K–₹1.6L/mo GEO Growth tier (published) | Custom / not publicly listed | Custom / not publicly listed | $3K / $5K / $8K AEO tiers; GEO custom | Custom / not publicly listed | Custom / not publicly listed | Custom after free audit | $1,499 / $2,499 introductory content + AI SEO | $2,500–$10,000/mo |
| Best-fit buyer | SME → enterprise teams wanting one accountable implementation partner | Growth / enterprise SEO + GEO | D2C, EdTech, real estate, B2B | AI-first mid-market teams | B2B SaaS content at scale | SEO-first brands adding AI search | Enterprise / BFSI | Pure GEO specialist buyers | B2B SaaS & tech | B2B brands |
| Next step | Book ITARV audit → | Tell us who you're comparing → | ||||||||
Each agency is checked against the same 8 capabilities. A full point is awarded only when its public material clearly shows the capability; half a point when it is partial or implied. The score measures breadth of the public offer, not guaranteed results or client satisfaction.
Use it as a shortlist filter. Several agencies score at the top, so the decision comes down to evidence, scope and commercial fit.
Scores are generated from the table rows above. A lower score can still be the better fit for a specialised use case.
Build my GEO baseline →Start with the business problem, not a list of deliverables. Pick the issue closest to what is happening now and it is carried into the strategy call.
Organic sessions are declining even though content is still being published.
Competitors appear in ChatGPT, Gemini or Perplexity while your brand is absent.
You may be mentioned, but competitors receive the source links and stronger recommendation language.
Keywords look good in reports but the enquiry pipeline does not improve.
Indexing, canonical, JS rendering, sitemap or template changes create recurring problems.
Blogs go out every month but impressions, citations and assisted conversions stay flat.
Branches or service areas appear unevenly across maps, local packs and AI recommendations.
Templates, scripts and media hurt user experience and complicate crawling/rendering.
You pay a retainer but cannot connect activity to leads, pipeline or revenue.
Assistants show stale products, wrong positioning, old prices or confusing company information.
Monthly reports list tasks completed but not why they mattered or what happens next.
Every lead depends on ads and organic discovery contributes too little.
Illustrative measurement framework, not a forecast. AI responses vary by engine, date, location and context.
Three fields to book. Add more context if you want the strategist to arrive with your prompt baseline already scoped.
One call. A clear next step — even if that's another agency.
No. AI systems and search engines decide what to retrieve and show. A credible agency should guarantee process, implementation and measurement, not a specific placement.
No. Strong crawlability, useful content, clear entities and credible authority still matter. GEO adds measurement and optimisation for AI-answer surfaces rather than replacing traditional SEO.
A fixed set of buyer prompts, multiple AI and search surfaces, the test date, brand and competitor mentions, citations and source URLs, answer context and a repeatable re-test schedule.
Guaranteed AI placements, screenshots without a repeatable prompt set, or a retainer that is only generic blog production with GEO added to the label.
Compare the actual scope: technical implementation, content volume, off-site authority, monitoring frequency, reporting, senior involvement and contract length. Monthly price alone is misleading.
ITARV publishes this page, so it lists itself first and says so. On the 8-point public-capability count it scores 8/8, tied with Nico Digital, PROHED, Reckona AI. Its differentiator is that paid media, CRO and web development sit with the same team as GEO. Buyers should verify fit and evidence on the call.
If you mainly need high-volume content production at the lowest unit cost, want a single-channel GEO specialist only, or require a very large dedicated in-house enterprise team, another agency on this list may suit you better.
Benchmark your brand against the competitors buyers already see in AI and search. Bring your domain and priority offer; we structure the first comparison around real commercial questions.